<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>the martini shaker* - Latest Comments in Why are we still using Alexa Rankings?</title><link>http://3rdmartini.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:23:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why are we still using Alexa Rankings?</title><link>http://blog.3rdmartini.com/why-are-we-still-using-alexa-rankings/#comment-1294716</link><description>But even then, surely you have to agree that you take that information with a grain of salt...  that is to say that you would assume that the actual traffic would potentially be far greater than what it's measuring.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that Alexa would be far more successful if they went with a Javascript include so that the responsibility falls on site owners instead of asking their visitors to install some toolbar that most people would associate with spyware in the first place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Fuksa:  Creative Genera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:23:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why are we still using Alexa Rankings?</title><link>http://blog.3rdmartini.com/why-are-we-still-using-alexa-rankings/#comment-1294718</link><description>I use Alexa purely for an idea of what a popular site might be generating traffic-wise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice job on the CSS Mania post!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seth</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>