<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>the MARTINI SHAKER - Latest Comments in Is it time for IM to go?</title><link>http://3rdmartini.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:41:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is it time for IM to go?</title><link>http://blog.3rdmartini.com/is-it-time-for-im-to-go/#comment-1787575</link><description>Go?  No.  I think they should actually be combined.  Imagine having a heated twitter conversation that you could just click 'start a meeting room' where skype, video or IM would start up.  I think it would be a great enhancement.  As well, IM should integrate so that you can IM to Twitter or vice versa.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">douglaskarr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it time for IM to go?</title><link>http://blog.3rdmartini.com/is-it-time-for-im-to-go/#comment-1768550</link><description>I ditched IM a few years ago, but after I got a job I found out there were good reasons for returning to it. I'm even considering putting it on my businesscard. The main reason is that it is a very good mix between e-mail and phone. It is easier to leave messages than on phone, but not as lettery as an e-mail. I can simply leave a "hows that file coming along?" to a coworker, or a "dinner at five?" to my girlfriend, and theyll respond when they have a free moment. It is also faster than e-mail, and when you work in an open  landscape, it is much more suited for personal chats than a phone. So I think the technology will live on and improve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:37:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it time for IM to go?</title><link>http://blog.3rdmartini.com/is-it-time-for-im-to-go/#comment-1735277</link><description>I have found myself recently trying to get people to use Skype for skype-2-skype conversations.  Now its not as easily accessible for those with limited bandwidth, firewall issues, or limited hardware (like no mic) but those issues are becoming more and more non-issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The time I can take to say something and have a truly dynamic conversation vs. typing is rather small.  And unlike a phone, I don't have to cramp my neck into weird positions and use only one hand.  Also the screen collaboration plugin (YugmaSE) is awesome.  IM just seems to be more of a pesky distraction more than a means of communication now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jwopitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:33:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it time for IM to go?</title><link>http://blog.3rdmartini.com/is-it-time-for-im-to-go/#comment-1734100</link><description>Hmm.  I see Twitter and IM as two completely different mediums that aren't really interchangeable.  Twitter's a lot more about broadcasting en masse whereas IM is all about conversations.  Twitter's DMs and @'s are way too cumbersome to have an IM-style conversation.  I do, however, have Adium update my IM status with my most recent 'tweet' for some hybridization (triple word score.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>